Skip to content

Crisis & Issue Response Planner

Respond to a product issue fast, calm, and credible.

What is the Crisis & Issue Response Planner?

The Crisis & Issue Response Planner is a free AI skill that helps a food or beverage brand respond to a product issue — a recall, a contamination scare, a viral complaint, or a social backlash — quickly, calmly, and credibly. You describe the situation, who's affected, and what you know so far; it returns a structured response — an honest holding statement, tailored messages for the stakeholders who matter (consumers, retailers, employees, media), a sequenced action plan, the do's and don'ts of crisis tone, and a clear list of the experts you must loop in before anything goes out. It is built for brand and comms teams who need a calm starting point in a stressful moment, not a blank page. Rather than spin, it leads with accountability and consumer safety, because that's what protects trust. It is explicitly not legal, PR, or food-safety advice — it flags where you must involve those experts. Pair it with real consumer-conversation data so you can gauge how the issue is actually spreading and where to respond first.

Who it's for

  • Brand and comms teams facing a product issue
  • Founders handling their first recall or backlash
  • Marketing leads who own social in a crisis
  • Insights teams monitoring how an issue is spreading

What you get

  • An honest, fast holding statement
  • Tailored messages by stakeholder (consumers, retailers, media, staff)
  • A sequenced response action plan
  • Crisis tone do's and don'ts
  • A list of experts to loop in before publishing
  • A monitoring and follow-up plan

How to use it

  1. 1Paste the prompt into ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini.
  2. 2Describe the situation, who's affected and what you know.
  3. 3Answer its clarifying questions.
  4. 4Route everything to legal, PR and food-safety experts before publishing.

See it in action

Example input

Situation: fictional 'PureBite' granola — a supplier flagged a possible undeclared-nut cross-contamination in one batch. No illnesses reported yet. Affected: one production lot in two regions. We need to act fast and responsibly. We have a small team and no crisis playbook.

Example output

Crisis response — PureBite possible undeclared-nut cross-contamination

FIRST, before anything public:
Loop in NOW — food-safety/QA, legal/regulatory, and your retailers. An allergen issue is a safety matter; their guidance shapes everything below. This skill is a starting draft, not a substitute for them.

Holding statement (consumer-facing, honest + fast):
"We've identified a possible allergen (nut) cross-contamination affecting a single batch of PureBite granola [lot number, regions]. Out of an abundance of caution, we are [recalling / advising customers not to consume] this lot. If you have a nut allergy and bought [product, lot], do not eat it — [return for a full refund / dispose of it]. Your safety is our priority and we are acting immediately. For questions: [contact]."
(Lead with the affected consumer and the action; no minimizing.)

Stakeholder messages:
- Consumers (allergy-affected first): clear lot ID, what to do, refund path, contact.
- Retailers: lot details, your action, what you need them to do (remove the lot), your point of contact.
- Employees: the facts + a single approved line so everyone says the same thing; route inquiries to one owner.
- Media (if it surfaces): the holding statement + a named spokesperson; never "no comment."

Action plan (sequenced):
1. Contain: confirm lot scope with QA; halt affected distribution.
2. Align: legal + regulatory sign-off on wording and recall scope.
3. Notify: retailers, then consumers, then (if needed) media — fast and consistent.
4. Support: stand up a contact/refund process.
5. Resolve & follow up: root cause, fix, and a follow-up statement.

Tone do's & don'ts:
- DO: be fast, factual, accountable; center consumer safety.
- DO: say what you ARE DOING, not just that you're "aware."
- DON'T: minimize, speculate on cause, blame the supplier publicly, or go silent.
- DON'T: publish anything before expert sign-off.

Monitoring & follow-up:
- Track mentions and consumer questions; respond consistently.
- Prepare an update for when the issue is resolved (close the loop publicly).

Experts to loop in (mandatory before publishing):
Food-safety/QA, legal/regulatory, your retail partners, and PR if you have it.

Want a short social-post version and a customer-service FAQ to match?

The prompt

Here's the start of the prompt. Download the free bundle for the full, ready-to-paste version — plus the installable Claude Skill and Custom-GPT instructions.

# Role
You are a food & beverage crisis communications advisor. In a product issue you lead with consumer safety and accountability, move fast, and stay factual. You are NOT a substitute for legal, regulatory, food-safety, or PR experts, and you always say so.

# Context I'll provide
- The situation: [WHAT HAPPENED]
- Who/what is affected: [PRODUCTS, LOTS, REGIONS, PEOPLE]
- What I know so far (and don't): [FACTS / UNKNOWNS]
- Severity (illnesses? safety risk?): [SEVERITY]

# Your task
1. If the situation, who's affected, or severity is unclear, ask up to 3 clarifying questions first.
2. State up front the experts that must be looped in before anything goes public.

Frequently asked questions

Can AI handle my crisis communications?
It can give you a fast, structured starting draft — a holding statement, stakeholder messages, and an action plan — when you're staring at a blank page in a stressful moment. But it is explicitly not a substitute for legal, regulatory, food-safety, or PR experts, and the skill repeatedly tells you to get their sign-off before anything goes public.
What should a holding statement do?
A good holding statement is fast, honest, and centered on the affected consumer: it states what's happening, what you're doing about it, and what the consumer should do — without minimizing, speculating on cause, or assigning blame. This skill drafts one in that shape, leading with safety and accountability because that's what protects trust.
Does it cover more than consumers?
Yes. It drafts tailored messages for every stakeholder who matters in a product issue — consumers first, then retailers, employees, and media — because each needs different information and they must all hear a consistent story. It also sequences who to notify in what order, which is critical in a recall.
What does it tell me NOT to do?
It's explicit about crisis don'ts: don't minimize the issue, don't speculate on the cause, don't blame your supplier publicly, don't go silent or say 'no comment,' and never publish before expert sign-off. These are the mistakes that turn a manageable issue into a trust crisis, so the skill flags them up front.

Related skills

Want the live data behind sharper outputs?

These skills get better with real-time F&B intelligence. See what Tastewise can do for your team.